A bitter High Court dispute has broken out between future neighbours in excess of the construction of the wall in a coastal web page in the north Dublin suburb, a circumstance which includes attracted countrywide interest next an Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on a proposed relatives dwelling at Sutton Strand, where allegations of scheduling breaches, environmental issues, and very long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in to the courts. The Irish Situations article about René Collier and also the Irish Instances article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as an area disagreement has evolved right into a really publicised legal fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of building performs at the location on Dublin Street, Sutton, the place Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and an organization director respectively, seek to develop their household house. The situation happens to be emblematic of broader disputes alongside Ireland’s coastline, where by enhancement pressures collide with environmental protections plus the sensitivities of recognized citizens. In accordance with the Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall currently being made by their future neighbours goes outside of the boundaries permitted beneath scheduling permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both inhabitants of Dublin Road, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions of their planning permission by developing a wall past the boundaries in their web site, bringing about an encroachment on the Distinctive Location of Conservation. The SAC designation is central into the dispute, as a result spots are topic to rigorous controls below European and Irish environmental legislation. Of their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even slight encroachments might have Long lasting ecological effects, significantly within a delicate coastal ecosystem like Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny These are in breach in their planning permission, and say the wall, that's partly crafted, is in the proper place. Their authorized crew has characterised the motion being an make an effort to hold off or frustrate a lawful development. The couple accuse litigants of searching for to halt homebuilding so as to maintain their perspective, an allegation which has been recurring in court docket and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the center of numerous coastal setting up disputes, where by sights of The ocean are both equally remarkably prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained spectacular initiatives because of the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by means of ocean in storm to photograph the positioning, In line with sworn evidence referenced in the Irish Times. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by waistline-large water throughout a storm to photograph the site Irish Times, a picture that has since come to be emblematic with the intensity of the dispute. These steps were not basically symbolic; they have been intended to Acquire Visible evidence of the wall’s posture relative to tidal traces and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location from your sea Irish Times described, describing how the two Adult men entered the drinking water during critical climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading as a result of storm drinking water to photograph the site became Just about the most striking descriptions to emerge from courtroom reporting. The Irish Times write-up about accountant Paul Feely famous that these kinds of steps have been cited to reveal the plaintiffs’ perception which the wall prolonged into a region afflicted by tidal movement, strengthening their argument that the SAC was remaining encroached upon.
The activities at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 have been protected in detail through the countrywide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Moments 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Situations January 27 2026 became extensively searched phrases as visitors sought to be aware of the background and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court read further more submissions on no matter if interim orders should be granted to halt development pending an entire Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a vital second while in the lawful timeline.
For the core in the dispute can be a disagreement above boundaries, planning compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely sustain that the wall, as constructed, goes beyond what was approved and intrudes into protected land. They argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by profession, continues to be called meticulous in his evaluation of scheduling paperwork, maps, and conditions attached on the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both of those pressured that their motion is inspired by worry for environmental protection and adherence to arranging legislation. They reject promises that the situation is about preserving A personal look at, insisting in its place that it is about making sure that enhancement at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they have explained their extended-standing relationship to the world as well as their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the opposite facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed by themselves as a couple only attempting to develop a relatives home in accordance Along with the regulation. They deny that the wall encroaches on the Particular Region of Conservation and say that all functions are performed based on Qualified guidance and permitted designs. Their legal professionals have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the remarkable actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, such as moving into the sea through a storm, tend not to alter the underlying details.
The case has also elevated broader questions about how scheduling disputes are resolved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court dispute about building of wall at coastal web-site is becoming a shorthand description to get a situation that many observers see as ever more widespread. As sea concentrations increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the specific delineation in between private land, public foreshore, and protected habitats has started to become extra contentious.
The Irish Moments post about René Collier famous the businessman had Formerly been linked to nearby advocacy on planning and environmental problems, although not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Moments article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how folks from quite distinctive Experienced backgrounds can discover on their own aligned in this kind of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reports spell their names, are becoming synonymous with the Sutton Strand situation.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location from the sea Irish Periods coverage emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded via waist-substantial h2o through a storm to photograph the site Irish Times and René Collier waded through waist-substantial h2o for the duration of a storm to photograph the website Irish Moments are phrases that appeared consistently in protection, reflecting each the physical actuality with the coastline and the symbolic nature from the act. For supporters of the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated commitment; for critics, they illustrated what they see as an excessive strategy.
Since the High Court proceedings carry on, the result remains unsure. The courtroom have to identify whether or not the wall as crafted complies with scheduling permission and whether or not any encroachment right into a Particular Region of Conservation has transpired. The authorized Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site from the sea Irish Times arguments are complicated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal details, and preparing problems. Nevertheless the human factor continues to be central: neighbours who have to live alongside each other very long once the legal fees are paid.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around building is effective at the internet site on Dublin Street, Sutton, nevertheless the implications of the case extend further than that tackle. For planners, builders, and inhabitants alike, the dispute serves like a reminder of the importance of clarity in setting up permissions and sensitivity in coastal advancement. Additionally, it underscores how promptly a local disagreement can escalate when elementary issues for instance environmental protection and house legal rights are perceived to become at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand continues to be a place of normal beauty and contested boundaries. The wall on the centre of your dispute stands partially developed, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved lawful questions. No matter if it will in the end be altered, taken off, or done as planned will depend on the court’s results. Until eventually then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will possible carry on to appear in headlines, linked indelibly to The most carefully watched arranging disputes in north Dublin lately.